Summary
Follow for latest updates
Madhya Pradesh High Court had asked the government which rules Under this, the Advocate General has been appointed as full time Public Prosecutor. In response to this, in the affidavit presented in the High Court by the State Government, it has been said that the Advocate General can be appointed to the post of Public Prosecutor. The next hearing in the case will be on 24 January. (indicative picture) – Photo: Social Media
Extension To the State Govt. In the affidavit presented in the High Court, it has been said that the Advocate General can be appointed to the post of Public Prosecutor. The petitioner urged for providing time to present the side in this regard. High Court Chief Justice Ravi Vijay Kumar Malimath and Justice Vishal Mishra accepted the request and held the next hearing 414 is set on Jan.
Please tell that in the petition filed on behalf of Gyan Prakash, a resident of Adhartal, it was alleged that by ignoring the rules, the state government is not appointing the Director of Prosecution, which is illegal. Earlier, the appointment of an IAS by the state government to the post of In-charge Director Prosecution was also put in the dock by the petitioner. Citing the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Case Flow Management Rules 2006 in the petition, it was said that for hearing of writ petitions Fast track and normal track have been made. Similarly, in criminal cases, death penalty, express track for cases like rape and dowry death, fast track for cases in which the accused did not get bail, rapid track for sensitive cases in which many people are being affected, special law Brisk track has been set up for cases under IPC and normal track for all other common offences. The petitioner said that the tracks fixed in the law made in the year 2006 are not being followed. Taking cognizance of the matter, the High Court had directed to hear the matter.
During the last hearing, it was stated in the affidavit presented by the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate that Section 46 appointments of Special Public Prosecutors have been made. It was told on behalf of the government that under section 24, with the consent of the High Court, the Advocate General has been appointed as Public Prosecutor. After the amendment, law officers have been given the responsibility of public prosecutor. The Jugal Peeth had asked the government under which rule the Advocate General has been appointed as a full-time Public Prosecutor. The said affidavit has been presented by the government citing the manuals of the law department and other states. During the hearing, the petitioner presented his side. ,