MP News: Read Many Big News Of The Court In One Click…

Madhya Pradesh High Court, Jabalpur – Photo: Social Media Expansion percent women reservation in police recruitment not implemented Challenging the departure, a petition was filed in the High Court. High Court Justice Nandita Dubey’s single bench after hearing percent posts of the final order Orders have been issued to remain subordinate. The single bench has issued notice to the non-applicants and sought their reply. Chetna Vaghel along with others It was said in the petition, years in the MP Police In , appointments were made for six thousand posts. The process of written examination, physical test and document verification has been completed for the appointment. Women’s reservation has not been implemented by the state government in police recruitment. Is. percent reservation should have been provided to the woman under the constitutional provision. During the hearing of the petition Women had applied to become intervenors. The single bench dismissed the application granting him liberty to file a fresh petition. Ekalpeeth has said in its order that I will be subject to final orders. While issuing notices to the State Government, DGP, ADGP and Professional Examination Board, the single bench has sought reply within three weeks. Advocate Dinesh Kumar appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Religious places The High Court is strict in the matter…

The High Court took the matter of religious places built illegally on the roadside and public places very strictly. A division bench of Chief Justice Ravi Vijay Malimath and Justice Vishal Mishra said during the hearing on Tuesday that since the order has not yet been complied with and the government has been seeking time in every appearance. In the next hearing, contempt proceedings will be initiated against all the officers and the charge will be heard. The couple’s bench has fixed the matter for further hearing on December 6. It is noteworthy that on behalf of Satish Verma, resident of Satna Building, had filed the said contempt. On the instructions of the Supreme Court, the High Court also took suo moto cognizance in the year 2018 to hear the case as a public interest litigation. Instructions were given. During the joint hearing on the petitions in the past, the couple was told that the order to remove illegal religious places in public places and roadside has not been fully followed. In road widening, drain construction or footpath 64 illegal religious places have become obstacles. Due to political pressure, the District Collector is retreating from the removal of illegal religious places. Illegal religious places of Cantonment and Railway and Army areas also could not be removed due to the apathy of Collector Jabalpur. The removed 08 illegal religious places are being reconstructed. At the same time, a report on the removal of illegal religious places was presented by the government. The couple was told that the proceedings were stopped due to Kovid, which would be resumed. The Jugalpeeth had granted four weeks time to the government to act. During the hearing in the case on Tuesday, petitioner advocate Satish Verma said, the contempt petition is pending from 2018 and till now the roadside And the temples and shrines built on government land have not been removed and the Collector Jabalpur is not taking action in this matter under political pressure and far from removing the old ones, new ones have been made and no action is taken even after complaining. . The expansion of flyovers and intersections has stopped at some places. On behalf of the Cantonment Board, the court was told that the collector was repeatedly written to remove the remaining religious places in the cant, but the magistrate and the police force were not given on time, on which the court has issued orders taking a strict stand. . The applicant himself presented his case in the matter.
Temples being built on government land.. .

2000 A petition was filed in the High Court challenging the construction of a temple on government land by the District Education Officer. While hearing the petition, a division bench of High Court Chief Justice Ravi Vijay Kumar Malimath and Justice Vishal Mishra issued notices to the non-applicants and sought answers. The next hearing on the petition has been fixed for December 2. In the petition filed on behalf of the petitioner, Advocate Rajendra Kumar Gupta, it was said that the gate number of the District Court- 4 and the High Court parking lot. The District Education Officer is getting the temple constructed on the government land of this corridor. The temple is being constructed in front of the District Education Officer’s office. In the petition, citing the orders of the Supreme Court and the High Court, it was said that religious buildings built on government land The sites are invalid. The said petition has been filed against no action being taken even after complaining in this regard. After hearing the petition, the Jugalpeeth has issued notices to the Divisional Commission, District Collector, Superintendent of Police, Corporator and District Education Officer, seeking their response. Advocate Greesh Jain appeared on behalf of the petitioner. ,