Madhya Pradesh High Court – Photo: Social Media Expansion Describing the State Government’s Freedom of Religion Act as illegal, half a dozen petitions have been filed in the High Court. An application was filed in the High Court seeking interim relief from not taking action under the Freedom of Religion Act for inter-caste marriage. The double bench of High Court Justice Sujay Paul and Justice Prakash Chandra Gupta have said in their order that the person under Article is free to marry under They are not required to make an application before the Collector under Section of the Religious Freedom Act. Is. In half a dozen petitions filed including Bhopal resident Azam Khan, HL Hardenia, it was said that the state government implemented The Gaya Freedom of Religion Act is illegal. This Act Article 12 of the Constitution, And is violating the principles of 21 and the right of a person to change religion and secularism. It was said in the petition that section 3,4,5,6,7 of this act, ,12 And 02 provisions are against the fundamental rights found in the constitution. 1644651296 It was said in the petition that adult persons have the right to marry voluntarily in the constitution. In the new law, there is a provision of punishment of three to ten years for marrying by intimidation, threatening, hiding and other person can also complain. Two such cases have been registered in the state, whose marriage took place four years ago. If there is a dispute after marriage, then action can be taken under this law. On behalf of the petitioners, interim relief was sought for not taking action under the said Act on inter-caste marriage. It was argued on behalf of the petitioner that the Rajasthan High Court should pass such orders. After the hearing, the Jugalpeeth had reserved the decision on the interim relief on 12 November. ,